PLATED LOBSTER Age: 95 million years The fossilized lobster pictured here, a member of the family Palinuridae,
reveals that these crustaceans have remained exactly the same for the
last 95 million years. The way that species undergo no changes over
millions of years is referred to as "stasis," and this represents a
major predicament for evolutionists. Stephen Jay Gould, one of
those evolutionists who has often stated that the fossil record does not
support the theory of evolution, said this on the subject in an
article in Natural History magazine in 1993: "[S]tasis, or nonchange, of most fossil species during
their lengthy geological lifespans was tacitly acknowledged by all
paleontologists, but almost never studied explicitly . . . [T]he
overwhelming prevalence of stasis became an embarrassing feature of the
fossil record, best left ignored as a manifestation of nothing (that
is, nonevolution)." (Stephen Jay Gould, "Cordelia's Dilemma," Natural History, February 1993, pp. 10-18) There is only one reason why evolutionists describe the stasis in the fossil record as an embarrassment: That living things have never changed means the invalidation of the theory of evolution. This fact, which demonstrates that evolution never happened, confirms the fact of Creation. |
MANTIS SHRIMP Age: 95 million years Mantis shrimps, which have survived unchanged ever
since the Carboniferous period (354 to 290 million years ago), are a
life form that invalidates Darwinism. It is impossible to provide any
evolutionary explanation for a creature that remains unaltered for 300
million years. The mantis shrimp pictured here is 95 million years old, yet is completely identical to both those that lived 300 million years in the past and specimens alive today. |
PUFFER FISH Age: 95 million years All the puffer fish fossils unearthed during the last 150 years are identical in every way to puffer fish alive today. If evolutionists' claims were true, then a great many fossils of semi-developed fish should have been excavated. Yet no such fossil ever has been, because no such intermediate form ever existed. The 95-million-year-old fossil pictured here is proof that puffer fish have always existed as puffer fish. |
LOBSTER Age: 95 million years The fact that concrete evidence, such as fossils,
argue against Darwinism cannot be concealed. Even evolutionists who
have the ability to evaluate modern-day scientific findings in an
unbiased manner admit it is plain to see that the fossil record opposes
the theory of evolution. In his book In Search of Deep Time, Henry Gee
states that there is no accumulation of evidence to support the theory
of evolution in the fossil record—and that, on the contrary, the
evidence at hand is interpreted by evolutionists in the light of their
own preconceptions: "Many of the assumptions we make about evolution, especially concerning the history of life as understood from the fossil record, are, however, baseless." (Henry Gee, In Search of Deep Time, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1999, pp. 1-2.) |
SEAHORSE Age: 5 to 1.8 million years Seahorses have always existed as seahorses, and are neither descended from not turned into any other life form. This fossil, which is proof that these creatures have never changed over millions of years, also declares that evolution is a lie. The origin of life does not lie in evolution. God, the Almighty and Omniscient, created the universe and all things within it. |
MANTIS SHRIMP Age: 95 million years None of the research conducted to date has been able to discover a single life form that represents the supposed evolutionary forebear of the mantis shrimp. No findings indicate that mantis shrimp came into being through any process of evolution. Every fossil unearthed shows that mantis shrimp have always existed as mantis shrimp and have remained unchanged for millions of years. |
PUFFER FISH Age: 95 million years You read pro-evolutionary reports in magazines and
newspapers and you see similar programs and documentaries on
television, not because Darwinism is a scientific viewpoint, but
rather, there are tireless efforts to support it out of ideological
concerns. Darwinism is the supposed scientific foundation for
materialism and atheism. No one who accepts Darwinism's invalidity can support
materialism and atheism. That is why, despite all scientific findings
and evidence arguing against the theory of evolution, these facts are
ignored, and Darwinism continues to be defended through lies and
distortions. One of the proofs that evolutionists refuse to acknowledge are the fossils, now numbering in the millions, each one of them clear proof of Creation. Like the 95-million-year-old puffer fish pictured, all fossils tell us that living things never evolved, and that God created them all. |
STINGRAY (with its pair) Age: 95 million years Science has proved that evolutionists' claims
regarding the origin of life are mere nonsense, and the theory of
evolution has collapsed in the face of many concrete findings. One of the countless bits of evidence to demolish the theory of evolution is the lack of any imaginary intermediate forms in the fossil record. Every fossil unearthed shows that all living species came into being with all their characteristics fully present, and remained unchanged from then on. The 95-million-year-old stingray in the picture is one such specimen. There is no difference between this fossil and stingrays alive today; and all stingrays have been exactly the same ever since they first appeared in the fossil record. |
SEA LILY Age: 150 million years The wealth of the fossil record poses a serious
dilemma for evolutionists. These fossils present those people unwilling
to understand the origin of life with a fully detailed, complete
picture. Living things emerged separately, each one in a single moment
and with all its different structures, with no imaginary "intermediate
evolutionary" forms preceding them. |
MANTIS SHRIMP Age: 95 million years Darwin's hypotheses regarding the origin of life were
based on no scientific findings or experiments. However, with the
support and encouragement he received from materialist biologists of
the time, Darwin constructed a theory out of these hypotheses.
According to his theory, all living things were descended from a
supposed single primitive ancestor, underwent minute changes over a very
long period of time, and thus became different from one another. This hypothesis has been confirmed by no concrete scientific findings, neither in Darwin's own time nor in the intervening 150 years. On the contrary, all the fossils unearthed have revealed that living things have remained unchanged, often for tens of millions of years and sometimes for hundreds. His theory has collapsed in the face of science. One of the proofs of that collapse is the 95-million-year-old mantis shrimp pictured. |
PUFFER FISH Age: 95 million years In the fossil record, it is sometimes possible to come
across remains of living things bearing features belonging to another
species. Darwinists, interpreting these findings in a prejudiced
manner, claim that these fossils confirm their theories. But that is a
grave error, because one living thing having features similar to
another's is not characteristic of any "intermediate form." The
platypus, for example, lives in Australia, and despite being a mammal,
lays eggs like reptiles. In addition, it has a beak resembling that of
birds. Scientists describe the platypus as a "mosaic form." Even
leading evolutionists admit that these cannot be regarded as
intermediate forms. Instead of engaging in distorted interpretations regarding mosaic forms, Darwinists need to produce concrete evidence to prove that species descended from one another by way of minuscule changes. But this they can never do, because no such process ever took place. |
BOWFIN Age: 50 million years The theory of evolution is not based on scientific
fact, but is maintained by means of invented scenarios and propaganda,
and it is impossible to find any fossils supporting this fictitious
theory. Darwinists have written an imaginary natural history, and have
attempted to find fossils to fit it. Yet the exact opposite actually
happened: Every new fossil places the theory of evolution in an even
worse predicament. |
SEA HORSE Age: 23 -5 million years Sea horses (Hippocampus sp.) generally cling
onto plants with their tails, and swim upright with their dorsal fin
because they lack tail fins. Their ability to swim upright is based on
their being able to fill their flotation sacs with air very quickly. Pictured is a fossilized sea horse discovered in rock beds in northern Italy. This sea horse, from Miocene period, is exactly the same in terms of all its organs and structures—its skeleton, flotation sac and gills—as present-day sea horses. Sea horses have remained unchanged since they first begin appearing in the fossil record, and fundamentally invalidate evolutionist claims. |
COELACANTH Age: 95 million years In 1938, Darwinists suffered a terrible disappointment
with the capture of a living coelacanth, a fish they had long depicted
as so-called evidence of the transition of vertebrates from the sea to
dry land. In the years that followed, some 200 coelacanths were
caught. In 1987, Professor Hans Fricke of the Max Planck Institute
observed these creatures in their natural habitat by descending to a
depth of 200 meters off the East African Comoro Islands, in a submarine
named Geo. He observed that their bony fins had no functional link to
the limbs that permit walking in tetrapods (four-footed animals). The April 2003 issue of Focus magazine reported the findings from this research: "The flexible fins had no similar functions to those
in four-footed land vertebrates. These allowed the creature to swim
head-down and in all directions, even backwards." (Focus, April 2003) With its structures that have remained unchanged for
400 million years, the coelacanth places evolutionists in a highly
difficult position. Bear in mind, too, that continental shifts have
taken place over those 400 million years, during which the coelacanth
never changed at all. It can be seen that evolutionists are in an utterly hopeless position. Moreover, the coelacanth exhibits a profound gulf between the marine and terrestrial life forms, between which the theory of evolution presumes a transitional link. |
STINGRAY (with its pair) Age: 95 million years The 95-million-year-old fossil stingray pictured
reveals that these fish have undergone no change since they first came
into being on Earth. This has gone down as yet another of the proofs
demolishing the Darwinist thesis that "Fossils support the theory of
evolution." Countless scientific books and articles have revealed
the invalidity of these illusory evolutionist claims. The fact that
fossils have failed to produce the "intermediate forms" of which Darwin
dreamed—and that, on the contrary, different living groups on Earth
appear suddenly in the fossil record and with all their unique
structures—is agreed by a great many scientists, including many
present-day evolutionist paleontologists. Niles Eldredge, for example, admits that evolutionist
paleontologists are well aware of the lack of intermediate forms and
the stasis in the fossil record (the fact that living species have
remained unaltered), but this evidence goes ignored: "Each new generation, it seems, produces a few young paleontologists eager to document examples of evolutionary change in their fossils. The changes they have always looked for have, of course, been of the gradual progressive sort. More often than not their efforts have gone unrewarded—their fossils, rather than exhibiting the expected pattern, just seem to persist virtually unchanged. . . . This extraordinary conservatism looked, to the paleontologist keen on finding evolutionary change, as if no evolution had occurred. Thus studies documenting conservative persistence rather than gradual evolutionary change were considered failures, and, more often than not, were not even published. Most paleontologists were aware of the stability, the lack of change we call stasis." (an excerpt from Niles Eldredge, "Evolutionary Tempos and Modes: A Paleontological Perspective," in the anthology What Darwin Began: Modern Darwinian and non-Darwinian Perspectives on Evolution [ed. Godfrey, 1985], as quoted in the book Darwin on Trial by Phillip E. Johnson, Regnery Gateway, 1991, pp. 58-60) |
GUITAR FISH Age: 95 million years The countless proofs revealed by paleontology over the
years confirm that living things never evolved. The fossil pictured is
one of the many proofs that evolutionists ignore. This
95-million-year-old fossil, popularly known as a guitar fish thanks to
its appearance, has to a large extent preserved its skeletal structure.
The head and fins can be made out in perfect detail. Confronted by this fossil, which is identical to modern-day guitar fish, evolutionists have no explanation to offer, and no evidence to submit. All they can do is attempt to mislead and deceive people through demagoguery. |
PIPEFISH Age: 40 million years Pipefish, members of the family Syngnathidae, are toothless, and their mouths are tube-shaped. Those that lived tens of millions of years ago had exactly the same features as pipefish alive today. Nonetheless, evolutionists still claim that pipefish came into existence by chance, as the result of a long process of evolution—as indeed they do with regard to all other life forms. They are completely lacking in any evidence to support their claims. Yet there are millions of proofs, like the one in the picture, that clearly show that the evolution hypothesis is not true. |
PUFFER FISH Age: 95 million years Darwinist publications contain no accounts based on
concrete scientific evidence. The fundamental dilemmas that contradict
the theory of evolution are glossed over in a few sentences, while on
the other hand, a great many fantastical scenarios are dreamed up and
presented as factual. Evolutionists constantly claim that all living things
developed by gradually evolving from one another, yet remain silent
when firm evidence is demanded. For example, if you ask evolutionists
who have offered a long explanation of how "Fish forced to emerge onto
dry land as the seas dried up eventually turned into reptiles" whether
they have any fossil evidence with which to support their claim, you
will never receive an answer. Despite all their searching over the last 150 years, Darwinists have failed to find one single example of an intermediate form. All the fossils they have unearthed show that life emerged suddenly—in other words, species were created, never changed, and never underwent evolution. |
NEEDLEFISH Period: Cretaceous Evolutionists, who persist in claiming that "species evolved from one another" at every available opportunity are helpless in the face of the fossil record because they possess not a single piece of evidence. The fossil needlefish in the picture, for instance, documents how these have remained unchanged for 95 million years. This slender fish, which belongs to the family Belonidae, is no different to specimens alive today. |
MANTIS SHRIMP Age: 95 million years The theory of evolution consists of a hypothesis. In
order for that hypothesis to be regarded as scientific it needs to be
testable or else confirmed by findings. Yet evolutionist fantasies lack
these criteria. There is no significance or scientific value in the
tales that Darwinists have been relating for so long, about how
invertebrates supposedly turned into vertebrates, how fish living in
the seas moved to the dry land as the oceans dried up, or how dinosaurs
chasing flies began to fly themselves. They need to point to a single
fossil of a half-invertebrate and half-vertebrate, half-fish and
half-reptile or half-dinosaur and half-bird—if any such exist. Evolutionists are unable to point to any such fossils, yet there are a countless—and ever-increasing—number of fossils proving that evolution never happened at all. This 95-million-year-old fossilized mantis shrimp is one such example. |
EEL |
SANDFISH |
CRAB |
SHRIMP |
SANDFISH |
STARFISH |
ANGELFISH (Cichlidae) |
RAZORFISH (Centriscus) |
SEA CUCUMBER (with its pair) |
STARFISH |
CORAL |
TROUTPERCH (Percopsidae) |
SCALLOP |
FLYING FISH Darwin hoped that excavations undertaken after his day
would produce fossils representing proof of his theory of evolution.
Yet even though digs were conducted for decades all over the world, no
such evidence was forthcoming. All the fossils unearthed to date have
proved that living things had not undergone evolution. |
CORAL |
STURGEON |
RAZORFISH |
SQUID |
STINGRAY |
SQUID |
SHRIMP |
CATSHARK |
GUITARFISH |
SHRIMP |
COELACANTH |
STINGRAY |
CRAYFISH |
SEA URCHIN |
STINGRAY |
SEA BASS |
FLYING FISH |
SAND FISH Age: 95 million years Despite having been scientifically discredited, the
theory of evolution is kept constantly on the agenda of certain
circles. Accompanied by drawings of imaginary half-man, half-ape
creatures of no scientific validity, reports headlined "Missing Link
Found!" announce every new fossil discovery. Captions read, "Our
ancestors were microbes," "We are no different from apes," "Did we come
from space?" and "Evolution in test tubes". The theory of evolution is
constantly depicted as having solid evidence to support it, one that
can explain every aspect of human life. The fact is, however, that fossils demonstrate that such
reports and the claims associated with them are mere nonsense. As with
the 95-million-year-old sand fish fossil pictured, all fossils reveal
that living species have not changed at all over millions of years—in
other words, that they never evolved. Faced with this reality,
evolutionist propaganda is seen as nothing more than helpless
posturing. The fossil in the illustration is a mirror-image one, traces of which can be seen on both surfaces of the split rock. |
EEL |
LADY FISH (Elopidae) |
PIPEFISH (Syngathodei) |
HORSESHOE CRAB |
SANDFISH Age: 95 million years In claiming that all species multiplied by having evolved from one another over long periods of time, Darwinists never stop to consider that almost all the main categories of species known today emerged suddenly and at the same time in the geological age known as the Cambrian Period, 530 to 520 million years ago. They fail to understand that none of the living things whose remains are preserved in the fossil record underwent any change, and that this fundamentally demolished the theory of evolution. Yet even if evolutionists refuse to think and understand, fossil findings such as the 95-millionyear-old sand fish pictured here reveal the invalidity of evolution for all to see. |
LADY FISH (Elopidae) (with its pair) |
NEEDLEFISH Age: 95 million years All the needlefish fossils discovered to date are completely developed, together with all their structures. There is no fossil evidence to suggest that needlefish are descended from any other species or that they gradually assumed their present-day form. This is one finding that invalidates Darwinist claims and reveals that Creation is a manifest truth. |
BRITTLESTAR
Age: 95 million years
Period: Cretaceous
Location: Haqel, Lebanon
Evolutionists constantly refer to hypotheses and engage
in various forms of conjecture regarding the origin of life. Yet they
are unable to support that conjecture with any scientific findings.
When those findings are comprehensively examined, they reveal that all
branches of science refute the idea of evolution.
Brittlestar fossils are one of these findings that refute
evolution. Brittlestars have remained unchanged despite the enormously
long passage of time. The brittlestar fossil pictured here is 95
million years old, but is identical to present-day brittlestars.
MENE (Mene maculata) |
STARFISH |
MACKEREL |
SQUID |
STURGEON
Age: 206 to 144 million years
Period: Jurassic
Location: Volcanic Ash Beds, Liaoning, China
Sturgeon, members of the order Acipenseriformes, the
remains of which species date back to very early periods, are
frequently encountered in the fossil record. They generally live in the
fresh waters and seas of the northern hemisphere. With their
structures, which have remained unchanged for tens and even hundreds of
millions of years, sturgeon are one of the living things that refute
the Darwinist claim that life forms evolved from the primitive to the
more complex.
The fossil record has revealed that even in very
early geological periods, there were already living organisms possessed
of complex systems such as eyes, gills and circulatory systems, as
well as advanced physiological structures, identical to those in
modern-day specimens.
New findings obtained in 1999, for instance, show
that in the Cambrian Period (490 to 543 million years ago), there were
two separate species of fish known as Haikouichthys ercaicunensis and
Myllokunmingia fengjiaoa. These findings deal a lethal blow to the
theory of evolution’s claim that species develop from the primitive to
the more complex.
|
NEEDLEFISH |
STARFISH |
SOLDIER FISH |
NEEDLEFISH |
COELACANTH |
VIPERFISH |
GUITARFISH Pictured here is a mirror-image fossil, leaving its imprint on both sides of the sedimentary rock. |
NEEDLEFISH |
EEL |
SQUID (with its pair) |
CATSHARK The remains of living things can be seen on both surfaces of this double-sided fossil. |
LOBSTER, FLYING FISH |
GUITARFISH |
NEEDLEFISH |
SQUID (with its pair) |
FOSSIL SPECIMENS OF LAND ANIMALS
HYENA SKULL |
HYENA SKULL Age: 9.5 million years |
WEASEL SKULL |
WOLVERINE SKULL |
TIGER SKULL |
WEASEL SKULL |
SPOTTED DEER SKULL |
FEMALE BINTURONG SKULL |
BOAR SKULL |
WOLVERINE SKULL |
ANTELOPE SKULL |
TIBETAN SAND FOX SKULL |
BROWN BEAR SKULL |
PANDA SKULL |
GRAY WOLF SKULL |
FISHER SKULL |
HYENA SKULL
|
WOLVERINE SKULL |
CROCODILE |
FROG |
SALAMANDER LARVA |
CROCODILE |
AN ELEPHANT’S FRONT TOOTH |
FOSSIL SPECIMENS OF LAND ANIMALS
TIGER SKULL |
HYENA SKULL |
SPECTACLED BEAR |
GOLDEN MONKEY SKULL |
ANTELOPE SKULL |
WOLF SKULL |
COYOTE SKULL |
RABBIT SKULL |
FOX SKULL |
RACOON SKULL |
CROCODILE SKULL |
HYENA SKULL |
ZEBRA SKULL |
ANTELOPE SKULL The 50-million-year-old fossil pictured is evidence that, like all other living things, antelopes did not undergo evolution. If evolutionists’ claims were true, then antelopes should have developed various different features over the intervening 50 million years and be very different from today’s antelopes. Yet antelopes today have exactly the same characteristics as they did the moment they were first created—which fact demolishes the idea of evolution. |
TIGER SKULL |
ANTELOPE SKULL |
TIGER SKULL |
TIGER SKULL |
TIGER SKULL |
WOLF SKULL |
A fossil is the name given to the remains or traces of a plant or animal preserved in geologic strata since prehistoric times—or in some cases, remains preserved encased in amber. Fossils collected from all over the world are one of our most important sources of information about the organisms that have existed on Earth since the very earliest times, even hundreds of millions of years ago. Research into fossils enables us to learn about extinct plants and animals, as well as earlier forms of species still in existence today. Thanks to this information, we learn which life forms existed at what epochs in time, what these life forms' features were, and whether they resembled present-day species.
According to Charles Darwin's theory of evolution—whose scientific invalidity has been revealed by subsequent scientific discoveries—all living things are descended from one single common ancestor. Darwin and his followers claimed that very different life forms developed from one another as the result of small changes over long periods of time.
According to the theory's unsupported claims, random coincidences gave rise to the first living cells. Subsequently, those cells that had formed by chance combined together and over the course of millions of years, became marine invertebrates. Later still, they developed spinal cords and became fish. These fish subsequently emerged onto dry land and gave rise to reptiles, from which birds and mammals then supposedly evolved separately.
There is no difference between this 54- to 37million-year-old fossilized plane tree leaf and leaves of the same species alive today. |
If this claim were true, then a great many "intermediate" forms showing the transition between different species should have once existed—and at least a few should have been fossilized. For example, if reptiles really had evolved into birds, then literally billions of half-bird, half-reptile creatures must once have existed. Similarly, there should have been large numbers of life forms that were part invertebrate and part fish, and half-fish, half-reptile. And these intermediate life forms must have had incomplete, partly-developed organs and structures. In addition, if such transitional species had really existed, then their numbers must have run into the hundreds of millions, or even billions, and their fossilized remains should be found all over the world.
![]() Charles Darwin |
Darwin referred to these conjectural creatures as "intermediate forms." He knew perfectly well that if his theory were to be proven, it was absolutely vital that the remains of at least a few of these intermediate forms be discovered. He explained why there must have been a large number of intermediate forms:
By the theory of natural selection all living species have been connected with the parent-species of each genus, by differences not greater than we see between the natural and domestic varieties of the same species at the present day... 1
Here, Darwin is saying that the differences between any "ancestor" and the "descendant" during the supposed process of evolution should be as small as the differences in the varieties of any particular living species (between a pedigreed spaniel and a mongrel, for instance). Therefore, if evolution had really taken place as Darwin claimed, it must have done so by way of very small, gradual changes.
Changes in any living thing subjected to mutation will be relatively small. In order for major changes to take place—such as forelegs developing into wings, gills into lungs, or fins into feet—millions of very small successive changes must have accumulated, again over millions of years. This process would necessarily give rise to millions of transitional intermediate forms.
![]()
This 50-million-year-old fossilized bowfin is proof that these fish, still alive today, have remained unchanged for tens of millions of years. |
![]() The distinguishing feature of these fossil crabs discovered in Denmark is that they are discovered in round concretions that rise to the surface of the ground at specific times of the year. These fossils, consequently known as "crab balls," generally date back to the Oligocene Period (37 to 23 million years ago). |
Following his statement quoted above, Darwin arrived at this conclusion:
… the number of intermediate and transitional links, between all living and extinct species, must have been inconceivably great. 2
EXCAVATIONS OVER THE LAST 150 YEARS HAVE UNEARTHED NOT A SINGLE INTERMEDIATE-FORM FOSSIL
Charles Doolittle Walcott collected some 65,000 specimens of the oldest complex life forms from the Burgess Shale region—and then perpetrated one of the worst scientific frauds of all time. The fossils he found, belonging to life forms from the Cambrian Period (543-490 million years), constituted major evidence that would totally refute the theory of evolution, he concealed them for 70 years in the Smithsonian Museum, of which he was the director at the time. The fact that not a single intermediate-form fossil has ever been unearthed in 150 years of excavations forced Darwinists to perpetrate various frauds. |
Darwin expressed the same point in other parts of his book On the Origin of Species:
If my theory be true, numberless intermediate varieties, linking most closely all of the species of the same group together must assuredly have existed... Consequently evidence of their former existence could be found only amongst fossil remains. 3
However, Darwin was well aware that no fossils of these intermediate forms had yet been found. He regarded this as a major difficulty for his theory. In one chapter of his book titled "Difficulties on Theory," he wrote:
Why, if species have descended from other species by insensibly fine gradations, do we not everywhere see innumerable transitional forms? Why is not all nature in confusion instead of the species being, as we see them, well defined?… But, as by this theory innumerable transitional forms must have existed, why do we not find them embedded in countless numbers in the crust of the earth?… Why then is not every geological formation and every stratum full of such intermediate links? Geology assuredly does not reveal any such finely graduated organic chain; and this, perhaps, is the most obvious and gravest objection which can be urged against my theory. 4
Darwin's only explanation for this major dilemma was lack of evidence—insufficient fossil remains had been discovered at that time. He maintained that later, when the fossil record was examined in detail, the missing intermediate links would inevitably be found. Over the last 150 years, however, research has shown that the hopes of Darwin and his successors were all empty: Not a single intermediate form fossil has ever been encountered.
There are now roughly 100 million fossils in thousands of museums and collections all over the world. All of them are identifiable as species with their own unique structures, distinguished from one another by major anatomical differences. No fossil remains of any half-fish, half-amphibian, or half-dinosaur, half-bird, or half-ape, half-human—forms so eagerly awaited by evolutionists—have ever been discovered.
The paleontologist Niles Eldredge and the anthropologist Ian Tattersall, both from the American Museum of Natural History, state that the fossil record is perfectly adequate in order to understand the history of life—, and that this record in no way supports the theory of evolution:
That individual kinds of fossils remain recognizably the same throughout the length of their occurrence in the fossil record had been known to paleontologists long before Darwin published his Origin. Darwin himself, ... prophesied that future generations of paleontologists would fill in these gaps by diligent search ... One hundred and twenty years of paleontological research later, it has become abundantly clear that the fossil record will not confirm this part of Darwin's predictions. Nor is the problem a miserably poor record. The fossil record simply shows that this prediction is wrong. 5
As these evolutionist scientists make clear, it is quite possible to see the true history of life in the fossil record—but there are no intermediate forms in that history.
Other scientists agree that no intermediate forms exist. For example, Rudolf A. Raff, director of the Indiana University Molecular Biology Institute, and the Indiana University researcher Thomas C. Kaufman have declared:
![]() New specimens of fossils are constantly being unearthed all over the world. The number of fossils so far discovered exceeds 100 million. Scientific institutions and academies examine these fossils in detail. Yet as a result of all these endeavors, not a single intermediate life form that might represent evidence for evolution has ever been found. |
The lack of ancestral or intermediate forms between fossil species is not a bizarre peculiarity of early metazoan history. Gaps are general and prevalent throughout the fossil record. 6
The fossil record has even preserved the microscopic remains of bacteria that lived billions of years ago. Yet despite this, not a single fossil belonging to any of these fictitious transitional life forms have ever been found. There are fossils belonging to thousands of different life forms, from ants to bacteria, and from birds to flowering plants. Fossils belonging to extinct plants and animals have been preserved so perfectly that we can establish the structures of extinct life forms that we never see alive today. The absence of even one single intermediate-form specimen, despite the fossil record being so rich, does not indicate that the fossil record is lacking. Rather, it shows the invalidity of the theory of evolution.
EVOLUTIONISTS' INTERMEDIATE-FORM DILEMMA
As you have seen, evolutionists appeal to the fossil record to confirm their claims that living species evolved gradually from one another. Yet even though 99% of the fossil record has been unearthed and catalogued, they still do not have a single piece of evidence to support the claim of evolution. For that reason, some evolutionists have attempted to manufacture their own fossils as alleged evidence for their theories, though subsequently these "remains" have been exposed as either hoaxes or distorted misinterpretations.
Fossils in the Earth's strata confirm the fact that all life forms have existed in their original perfect state ever since they were first created. The Glasgow University professor of palaeontology T. Neville George expressed this many years ago:
There is no need to apologize any longer for the poverty of the fossil record. In some ways it has become almost unmanageably rich, and discovery is outpacing integration … The fossil record nevertheless continues to be composed mainly of gaps.7
The paleontologist Niles Eldredge describes the invalidity of Darwin's blaming the insufficient nature of the fossil record for why no intermediate forms had been found:
The record jumps, and all the evidence shows that the record is real: the gaps we see reflect real events in life's history-not the artifact of a poor fossil record.8
Many people have the mistaken impression that there is a positive correlation between the fossil record and Darwin's theory—a misconception that was explained in an article in Science magazine:
A large number of well-trained scientists outside of evolutionary biology and paleontology have unfortunately gotten the idea that the fossil record is far more Darwinian than it is. This probably comes from the oversimplification inevitable in secondary sources: low-level textbooks, semi-popular articles, and so on. Also, there is probably some wishful thinking involved. In the years after Darwin, his advocates hoped to find predictable progressions. In general these have not been found yet the optimism has died hard, and some pure fantasy has crept into textbooks.9
The American palaeontologist S. M. Stanley describes how the truth revealed by the fossil record is ignored by the Darwinist mind-set that dominates the scientific world, which causes others to ignore it, as well:
The known fossil record is not, and never has been, in accord with gradualism. What is remarkable is that, through a variety of historical circumstances, even the history of opposition has been obscured. ... as the biological historian William Coleman has recently written, 'The majority of paleontologists felt their evidence simply contradicted Darwin's stress on minute, slow, and cumulative changes leading to species transformation.' ... their story has been suppressed.10
![]() |
CAMBRIAN FOSSILS AND THE CREATION OF SPECIES
The oldest of the Earth's strata in which the fossils of complex life forms appear were laid down in the Cambrian Period, estimated at between 543 and 490 million years ago. In strata older than the Cambrian, no fossils of living things are found, apart from single-celled organisms. In the Cambrian Period, however, a variety of distinctly different life forms suddenly appeared. More than 30 life forms, such as sea urchins, starfish, trilobites, snails and fish appeared in a single moment.
![]() A 380-MILLION-YEAR OLD TRILOBITE FOSSIL Trilobites are some of the most abundant life forms to have emerged in the Cambrian period. They lived in various parts of the world. One of the most astonishing characteristics of trilobites is their multi-lens eye, made up of numerous units, each unit being a separate lens. Each lens perceives a different image, and these are then combined as a whole "picture." Research has shown that there were more than 3,000 lenses in the trilobite eye, which meant the creature received more than 3000 images. This, in turn, clearly reveals how perfect were the eye and brain structure of this creature that lived nearly 530 million years ago. Such a flawless structure could not possibly have emerged by way of evolution. |
Furthermore, contrary to the assumptions of the theory of
evolution, all of the life forms that appeared so suddenly possess
highly complex physical structures, not simple "rudimentary" ones.
According to the erroneous theory of evolution, more sophisticated life forms must have evolved from other, more primitive ones. Yet there are no complex life forms at all prior to those of the Cambrian Period. These Cambrian life forms appeared all at once, with not a single earlier forerunner. The British zoologist Richard Dawkins, the best-known living proponent of the theory of evolution, admits that:
It is as though they [Cambrian creatures] were just planted there, without any evolutionary history.11
![]() The Cambrian life forms unearthed in the Chengjang region of China display highly striking diversity and particularly intricate structures. These life forms have bodies made up of various sections, antennae with special functions, the ability to hunt and complex anatomical structures. The fact that such sophisticated creatures were alive roughly half a billion years ago entirely does away with the theory of species evolving from the simple to the more complex. |
This fact definitively invalidates the theory of evolution. Because in The Origin of Species, Darwin wrote:
If numerous species, belonging to the same genera or families, have really started into life all at once, the fact would be fatal to the theory of descent with slow modification through natural selection.12
This lethal blow that Darwin so feared came from the Cambrian Period, at the very beginning of the fossil record.
New life forms also appeared suddenly and with complete, flawless structures in the ages after the Cambrian. Basic groups such as fish, amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals each appeared on Earth in a single moment and in flawless forms. Not a single intermediate form of the kind hoped for by evolutionists exists among them.
This fact revealed by the fossil record proves that living things have not evolved from the simple to the more complex, neither functionally nor in terms of appearance, but were created by God. The evolutionist Mark Czarnecki admits as much:
A major problem in proving the theory has been the fossil record; the imprints of vanished species preserved in the Earth's geological formations. This record has never revealed traces of Darwin's hypothetical intermediate variants—instead species appear … abruptly, and this anomaly has fueled the creationist argument that each species was created by God.13
"MISSING LINK DISCOVERED" HEADLINES ARE AN UNSCIENTIFIC DECEPTION
![]() Pro-Darwinist reports appearing so frequently in the evolutionist media consist of conjecture and propaganda. These reports are written to conceal the fact that Darwinism has been defeated. |
If you've ever read a newspaper headline announcing the discovery of a "missing link," then you can be certain that the report has no scientific value. Serious scientists long ago abandoned the idea of "missing links" and accepted that it is unscientific to make evolutionary conjectures based on fossils.
Henry Gee, a paleontologist and editor of the scientific journal Nature, writes this on the subject in his 1999 book In Search of Deep Time:
Given the ubiquitous chatter of journalists and headline writers about the search for ancestors, and the discovery of missing links, it may come as a surprise to learn that most professional palaeontologists do not think of the history of life in terms of scenarios or narratives, and that they rejected the storytelling mode of evolutionary history as unscientific more than thirty years ago.14
These persistent reports about missing links aim to give the impression that simply making a discovery will confirm the hypothesis that one species develops into another. Yet excavations over the last century and more have left totally unfounded the expectations that intermediate forms between species would be discovered. The eminent palaeontologist A. S. Romer admitted this as far back as 1963:
"Links" are missing just where we most fervently desire them [to point to a transition between species] and it is all too probable that many "links" will continue to be missing.15
Paleontologists have kept their missing links on the "missing list." Yet their own admissions run contrary to the impression that certain media outlets seek to give. For example, Niles Eldredge, and Ian Tattersall lack the media's positive air of expectation:
One of the most pervasive myths in all of paleontology...is the myth that the evolutionary histories of living beings are essentially a matter of discovery. … But if this were really so, one could confidently expect that as more hominid fossils were found the story of human evolution would become clearer. Whereas if anything, the opposite has occurred. 16
To sum up, the missing link is not a creature waiting to be discovered, but an idea that palaeontologists have long since abandoned, and which cannot be the subject of any truly scientific inquiry. Therefore, why is it the subject of so much insistent propaganda?
The answer to this question lies in the world-view espoused by the theory of evolution. Materialists and atheists have attempted to keep Darwin's theory alive ever since he first put it forward in the mid-19th century. Because although the theory is based on a completely imaginary scenario, materialists seized on it as a supposedly scientific hypothesis.
The evolutionist thinker Mary Midgley expresses this:
It [the theory of evolution] is, and cannot help being, also a powerful folk-tale about human origins. … Suggestions about how we were made and where we come from are bound to engage our imagination, to shape our views of what we now are, and so to affect our lives. 17
![]() "The first point is that selfishness and violent are inherent in us, inherited from our remotest animal ancestors ... Violence is, then, natural to man, a product of evolution." |
At the end of his biology text book Life on Earth, the Darwinist biologist Edward O. Wilson makes this admission on the subject of evolutionist claims:
Every generation needs its own creation myths, and these are ours. 18
"Missing link" propaganda is therefore a deception intended to keep the evolutionary myth about the origins alive and influential. Evolutionary propaganda is the most important vehicle materialists have for spreading their views. The concept of the "missing link" is key in terms of Darwin's fictitious idea of all species being traceable to common ancestors. Therefore, the more that evolutionists can keep their concept in the spotlight, the more support they hope to muster for their materialist views. That is behind all their efforts to distract the public from the collapse of Darwinism by means of "missing link" headlines.
Despite
the evolutionist media's best endeavors, the fossils they describe are
not missing links, and neither can anything about them confirm
Darwin's theory. These "news" reports consist solely of unscientific
speculation regarding newly discovered fossils of extinct species. Yet
this unscientific propaganda will not alter the fact that evolutionist
scientists themselves admit that there is no scientific basis to the
concept of the missing link, nor is there any trace of intermediate
forms in the fossil record. The reality that the fossil record reveals
is that evolution never occurred.
As in the previous two volumes of the Atlas of Creation series, in the following pages of this book, Volume 3, you will see fossils belonging to life forms that existed tens, or even hundreds of millions of years ago, matched together with their present-day counterparts. You can see for yourself these "living fossils"—of which there are countless examples. Yet they are seldom reported in evolutionary publications, which instead resort to reports regarding "missing links," which are simply products of highly prejudiced propaganda. You will be able to understand that efforts to disguise various hoaxes and unscientific claims as scientific developments are the products of the materialist mindset.
At the same time, you will discover how life forms have existed for millions of years complete with all their perfect and complex features and have survived with no changes in structure or appearance—and how each one is indisputable proof of the fact of Creation.
DARWIN'S ILLOGICAL AND UNSCIENTIFIC FORMULA
When the subject of evolution comes up, many people imagine that this is a scientific problem—and that for anyone less knowledgeable than scientists, Darwinism is impossible to understand. They assume it's pointless to argue the issue, one way or the other. Indeed, Darwinists employ Latin words and scientific terms generally unfamiliar to the public in order to encourage this mistaken idea. They engage in complicated descriptions and frequently resort to demagoguery and hollow slogans in order to give the impression they are discussing a highly scientific matter.
In fact, however, Darwinism's basic claim is completely unscientific, and its logical poverty is so obvious that even primary school age children can see it. According to Darwinism, in some unexplained manner, the first cell supposedly formed in the Earth's primeval environment, in a pool of muddy water. And out of that single cell, a literally endless series of coincidences later gave rise to animals, plants, human beings and civilizations. In other words, all of mankind, as well as the entire plant and animal kingdoms, are supposedly the work of an ideal quantity of mud, a long period of time and plentiful coincidences.
According to Darwinists, who are suffering from an obvious logical deficiency, these materials, each one of which is unconscious, gave rise to human beings possessed of reason and conscience, who think, love, feel compassion, possess sound judgment, produce paintings and statues, compose symphonies, write novels, build skyscrapers, construct nuclear reactors, discover the causes of diseases and manufacture drugs to cure them, or engage in politics. They claim that when sufficient time had passed, lions, tigers, rabbits, deer, elephants, cats, dogs, moths, flies, crocodiles and birds all evolved by chance from muddy water. A whole range of fruits and vegetables, with their own unique tastes and smells—oranges, strawberries, bananas, apples, grapes, tomatoes, peppers—flowers with their matchless appearances and other plants all emerged from that same mud.
In short, ever since Darwin's time, countless articles, papers, films, newspaper reports, magazine articles and television programs have repeated the evolutionist scenario in which all of life emerged by chance from mud. In other words, if you ask a Darwinist "How did our civilization arise?" or, "How did such a wide range of life forms come into being?" or, "How did mankind come into existence?" the essential answer you will receive is this: Coincidences gave rise to all these things from mud, over the course of time.
One would doubtless need to be devoid of reason or lack any facility for understanding in order to believe such a tale. Yet surprisingly, that very irrational and illogical theory has had its adherents for many years and is still being propagated constantly under a scientific guise.
The Lies of Darwinism Have Been Unmasked
The theory of evolution, first proposed under the primitive conditions of the 19th century, has been disproved by advances in science and technology. It has been recognized that Darwin's claims are totally unrealistic: Natural selection and mutations, cited as the mechanisms that drive the process of evolution, have no effects of the kind envisaged by Darwinists. In short, it is impossible for them to give rise to new species.
The final death blow to Darwinism was dealt by the fossil record. Darwin claimed that all the millions of different life forms had come into being through descent from a supposed single common ancestor. In order for his claim to be verified, there should be traces in the fossil record—an irrefutable document of natural history—of this supposed primitive ancestor and of the various life forms that developed from it. For example, if all mammals were descended from reptiles, as evolutionists maintain, then there would have to be fossil remains of a series of half-mammalian, half-reptilian life forms. To date, millions of fossils, belonging to a great many species, have been unearthed during excavations. Yet not a single one showing a transition between species has ever been found. Every fossil ever found shows that each living thing emerged suddenly, with all its characteristics complete. In other words, every species of plant and animal was created.
![]() Crocodiles are one example of living fossils. They appeared with all their physical structures fully formed and have survived down to the present day without undergoing any change at all over a period of around 100 million years (there are crocodile fossils dating back 140 million years). The fact that there is no difference between the 100-million-year-old fossil crocodile in the picture and those alive today once again emphasizes this fact. |
Confronted by this fact, evolutionists have resorted to various falsehoods. They have produced hoaxes—counterfeit, artificial fossils that have come to be regarded as disgraces to paleontology. They have tried to deceive the lay public by tampering with genuine fossils of extinct life forms and inventing a series of imaginary scenarios.
One of the best known of them is the so-called "evolution of the horse." Fossils belonging to entirely different species that once lived in India, South America, North America and Europe were arranged in order of size—from small to large—in the light of evolutionist imaginations. So far, different researchers have come up with more than 20 different equine evolution scenarios.
![]() |
There is no agreement among them regarding all these completely different family trees. The one point they commonly agree upon is their belief that a dog-like creature known as Eohippus (or Hyracotherium) that lived in the Eocene epoch (54 to 37 million years ago) was the very first ancestor of today's horses. However, Eohippus—portrayed as the ancestor of the horse and that became extinct millions of years ago—is almost identical to the present-day animal known as the hyrax, which looks nothing like a horse and is totally unrelated to that species. 19
![]() Using the skulls of extinct apes and various races of humans that once lived in the past, evolutionists seek to establish an imaginary family tree. However, the scientific evidence denies them the opportunity. |
Moreover, it has been established that breeds of horse living today have also been discovered in the same rock strata as Eohippus. 20 This means that the horse and its supposed ancestor were both living at the same time, which proves that the horse never underwent any such process as evolution.
The invalidity of the "equine series" proposed by evolutionists also applies to birds, fish, reptiles and mammals, in short, to all living things, to their supposedly common ancestors and supposed family trees. It has been determined that every fossil species suggested as being the ancestor of some other living thing either belongs to an independent extinct life form or is the result of evolutionists tampering with fossils of the species in question.
Satan's Game Has Been Exposed
Darwinism has been exposed as the most wide-ranging and astonishing deception in the world's history. That millions have been taken in by this deception, as if hypnotized, and have been influenced by all of Darwinism's illogical claims, is truly miraculous. The support lent to the theory of evolution and the acceptance it has enjoyed up to now are the result of tricks played on mankind by satan, who urges vast numbers of people towards Darwinism.
Until recently, no one had the courage to unmask this ruse of satan's and to publicize the true facts. But in the present century, the response to this deception has finally been laid out in full detail, and the public has been made fully aware of the state of affairs. By the will of God, the collapse of Darwinism has advanced beyond any point of recovery. Indeed, that is the fundamental reason for the panic in the Darwinian global empire.
ATLAS OF CREATION VOLUME II >>>
1. C. Darwin, The Origin Of Species, Chapter X, "On the Imperfection of the Geological Record."
2. C. Darwin, The Origin of Species, Chapter X, p. 234.
3. C. Darwin, The Origin of Species, Chapter I, p. 179.
4. C. Darwin, The Origin of Species, Chapter I, p. 172.
5. N. Eldredge and I. Tattersall, The Myths of Human Evolution, Columbia University Press, 1982, pp. 45-46.
6. R. A. Raff and T. C. Kaufman, Embryos, Genes and Evolution: The Developmental Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change, Indiana University Press, 1991, p. 34.
7. T. N. George, "Fossils in Evolutionary Perspective," Science Progress, Vol. 48, January 1960, p. 1.
8. N. Eldredge and I. Tattersall, The Myths of Human Evolution, p. 59.
9. Science, July 17, 1981, p. 289.
10. S. M. Stanley, The New Evolutionary Timetable: Fossils, Genes, and the Origin of Species, Basic Books Inc. Publishers, N.Y., 1981, p. 71.
11. R. Dawkins, The Blind Watchmaker, 1986, p. 229.
12. C. Darwin, The Origin of Species, 1st ed., p. 302.
13. M. Czarnecki, McLean's, 19 January 1981, p. 56.
14. H. Gee, In Search of Deep Time, Beyond the Fossil Record to a New History of Life, The Free Press, A Division of Simon & Schuster, Inc., 1999, p. 5.
15. A. S. Romer, Chapter in Genetics, Paleontology and Evolution (1963), p. 114
16. N. Eldredge and I. Tattersall, The Myths of Human Evolution, p. 127.
17. M. Midgley, Evolution as a Religion, London: Routledge Classics, 2002, p. 1.
18. E. O. Wilson, et al., Life on Earth, [1973], Sinauer Associates: Sunderland MA, 1975, reprint, p. 624.
19. F. Hitching, The Neck of the Giraffe: Where Darwin Went Wrong, New York: Ticknor and Fields, 1982, pp. 30-31.
20. F. Hitching, The Neck of the Giraffe, pp. 30-31.
FOSSIL SPECIMENS OF INSECTS
WASP (above left) CENTIPEDE (above right) |
MILLIPEDE (above left) MILLIPEDE (above right) |
WINGED PLANT LOUSE (above left) TUMBLING FLOWER BEETLE (above right) |
CENTIPEDE (above left) HAIRY FUNGUS BEETLE AND LONG-LEGGED FLY (above right) |
DEATHWATCH BEETLE (above left) Like all other beetles, this deathwatch beetle preserved in amber that dates back to the Eocene epoch (54 to 37 million years ago) possesses very interesting characteristics. During their larval stage, deathwatch beetles store the nutrients they need as fat tissue and use them during their adult stage, not taking on any further nutrients from the outside. These insects, which live in wood, are able to digest cellulose with the help of bacteria and fungi in their stomachs. During the mating period, they knock on the tunnels they've dug in the wood, producing a noise that can easily be heard by human beings. Deathwatch beetles have had these fascinating characteristics for millions of years. NON-BITING MIDGES AND WASP (above right) |
WASP (above right) CENTIPEDE (above left) Darwin and those who came after him believed that the fossil record would eventually provide evidence for their theories. Yet the exact opposite transpired: The fossil record actually provides abundant evidence for Creation, and refutes evolution. |
CRANE FLY (above left) DEATHWATCH BEETLE (above right) |
Dragonfly |
FOSSIL SPECIMENS OF INSECTS
ROVE BEETLE AND TWO FLIES (above left) FALSE CLICK BEETLE (above right) These beetles, members of the Eucnemidae family, are mostly brown or black and inhabit forest areas. Fossils show that false click beetles have always existed as false click beetles, have never undergone any change and didn't evolve from any other insect. Despite the millions of years that have passed, false click beetles which have undergone no change refute the claims of evolutionists. |
TOE-WINGED BEETLE AND DARK-WINGED FUNGUS GNAT (above right) SCALE INSECT (above right) |
WASP (above left) FUNGUS WEEVIL (above right)
|
FALSE FLOWER BEETLE (above left) False flower beetles, belonging to the Scarabaediae family, feed on the leaves of some plants. Fossil record shows that, like all other beetles, this species too had no change since it first appeared. These creatures have no intermediate form and are yet another one of the proofs of evolution's invalidity. Evolutionists admit that no intermediate form was encountered in the fossil record. Boyce Rensberger took the floor at the Field Museum of Natural History in Chicago, in a symposium in which the problems of gradual evolution was discussed by 150 evolutionists over four days: "Instead of gradual change, fossils of each intermediate species appear fully distinct, persist unchanged, and then become extinct. Transitional forms are unknown." (Boyce Rensberger, Houston Chronicle, 5 October 1980, Section 4, p. 15.) PSEUDOSCORPION AND FLY (above right) The accompanying fly in amber is another creature that sustains its existence and thus refutes Darwin. |
HAIRY FUNGUS BEETLE (above left) LONG-LEGGED FLY AND CADDISFLY (above right) |
ANTS (above left) Age: 45 million years Technology, cooperative work, military strategy, efficient communication networks, an ideal and rational hierarchy, discipline, immaculate city planning—in these fields where human beings are not always successful, ants always are. And they have been for tens of millions of years. Ants that lived 45 million years ago and those living today share the exact same characteristics. BEE (above right) Age: 45 million years Like all other creatures, bees have their own species-specific behaviors that present many questions for the evolutionists. For example, they are unable to explain through the fictitious mechanisms of evolution the inconceivably complex calculations that the bees employ to make honeycombs. Charles Darwin was also constrained to admit that his theory could not explain the behavior of bees. In his book, The Origin of Species, Darwin emphasized the dilemma of his theory about the origin of living things: "As natural selection acts only by the accumulation of slight modifications of structure or instinct, each profitable to the individual under its conditions of life, it may reasonably be asked, how a long and graduated succession of modified architectural instincts, all tending towards the present perfect plan of construction, could have profited the progenitors of the hive-bee?" (Charles Darwin, The Origin of Species, p. 186.) |
LARVA OF A SNAKEFLY (above left) FLOWER-CRICKET (above right) |
STILT FLY (above left) . . . There seems to have been almost no change in any part we can compare between the living organism and its fossilized progenitors of the remote geological past. Living fossils embody the theme of evolutionary stability to an extreme degree. . . We have not completely solved the riddle of living to an extreme degree. . . (Niles Eldredge, Fossils, 1991, pp. 101, 108.) These are the words of Niles Eldredge, a paleontologist from the American Museum of Natural History and an advocate of punctuated equilibrium. He posited this thesis in the face of the desperate situation of the gradual evolution theory developed by Darwin's leadership. Eldredge manifests the fact that 45-million-year-old fossils like the stilt fly pictured here place evolutionists in a deadlock. MILLIPEDE AND SPIDERS (above right) |
ASSASSIN BUG (above left) TUMBLING FLOWER BEETLE (above right) |
STICK INSECT (above left) MILLIPEDE (above right) |
FOSSIL SPECIMENS OF INSECTS
MOSQUITO (above left) BLACK FLY (above right) |
PEDILID BEETLE (above left) LAUXANIID FLIES AND MIDGE (above right) |
LEAF BEETLE (above left) JUMPING GROUND BUG AND GALL GNAT (above right) |
TICK (above left) SAP BEETLE (above right) |
TENERAL MAYFLY (above left) WEBSPINNER (MALE) (above right) |
WATER STRIDER |
WASP |
FROGHOPPER |
ANT-LOVING BEETLE (above left) THRIP (above right) Thrips, of which there are more than 5,000 species, fall under the order of Thysanoptera. They have not undergone any change since the first day of their existence, and the fossil record is the most important proof of this. The fossil thrip pictured is 25 million years old, but is no different from those thrips living today, which emphasizes the invalidity of evolution and demonstrates that Creation is a clear fact. |
FLAT-FOOTED BEETLE (above left) CENTIPEDE AND NON-BITING MIDGES (above right) |